想必现在有很多小伙伴对于DCalifornia likes to think of itself as the state where the futurehappens, and in 2008, its voters decided the future was high-speedrail. So they approved a $9 billion bond issue to begin an incrediblegovernment infrastructure project：a bullet train connecting San Francisco and Los-Angeles, at a cost of $33 billion.For years, the optimists have imagined Californians will travelquickly, comfortably and environmentally between the state*s twomajor population centers. The pessimists, meanwhile, have watched theproject costs a lot. At last count, the estimates had traveled up to$75 billion, even were still climbing.On Tuesday, Gov. Gavin News om (D) in his statespeech called for the state to transform the project to a less costlyrail that would run through the Central Valley, which attractedvoters' elsewhere attention,because what happened in Californiaillustrates the fact that any U.S. rail project may take a risk.Distance. In other places of the world, major population centers aremuch closer to each other. And big cities that are reasonably closetogether is pretty much an essential condition for high-speed rail,which is why they have it and we don't. Imagine what it would take tobuild a line from New York City to Los Angeles 一or to Chicago, Houston or Phoenix.Wealth. Of course, the United States does have a few cities that lookripe for rail. And instead of high-speed rail between these cities,we have the express, which takes eight hours to travel fromWashington to Boston. Why haven't we built something better? Becausetruly high-speed rail needs to travel in a fairly straight line.Building newer, better, straighter rail lines would require thegovernment to buy all the land between Point A and Point B and teardown anything that happened to be in the way. However, what's betweenPoint A and Point B is a great deal of highly valuable real estatethat will be very expensive to purchase.California displays all these problems totally. The part of the railline that was reasonably cheap to build didn't go anywhere near wherethe people were ； itran through the Central Valley where land was reasonably cheap andthe lobbies were relatively few.12.Inparagraph 1, the author intends to A.provethe point of the passageB.explaina government projectC.introducea topic for discussionD.presentthe background information13.Whatdo we know about the bullet train project?A.Allpeople are not in favor of the bullet train project.B.Thecost of the project is approximately 75 billion.C.Otherstates have to risk building their own bullet program.D.Theproject will make Americans travel rapidly, cozily andenvironmentally.14.Whatmainly leads to bullet train program's failure?A.Governorsin California tend to leave the project behind.B.Thedistance is the main reason to limit the bullet project in America.C.Noneof cities in America can afford to build a bullet train.D.Bullettrain is not as popular as express in America.15.Whatattitude does the author hold towards the high-speed rail inCalifornia?A.Indifferent. B. Neutral. C. Negative. D. Optimistic.","title_text":"DCalifornia likes to think of itself as the state where the futurehappens, and in 2008, its voters decided the future was high-speedrail. So they approved a $9 billion bond issue to begin an incrediblegovernment infrastructure project：a bullet train connecting San Francisco and Los-Angeles, at a cost of $33 billion.For years, the optimists have imagined Californians will travelquickly, comfortably and environmentally between the state*s twomajor population centers. The pessimists, meanwhile, have watched theproject costs a lot. At last count, the estimates had traveled up to$75 billion, even were still climbing.On Tuesday, Gov. Gavin News om (D) in his statespeech called for the state to transform the project to a less costlyrail that would run through the Central Valley, which attractedvoters' elsewhere attention,because what happened in Californiaillustrates the fact that any U.S. rail project may take a risk.Distance. In other places of the world, major population centers aremuch closer to each other. And big cities that are reasonably closetogether is pretty much an essential condition for high-speed rail,which is why they have it and we don't. Imagine what it would take tobuild a line from New York City to Los Angeles 一or to Chicago, Houston or Phoenix.Wealth. Of course, the United States does have a few cities that lookripe for rail. And instead of high-speed rail between these cities,we have the express, which takes eight hours to travel fromWashington to Boston. Why haven't we built something better? Becausetruly high-speed rail needs to travel in a fairly straight line.Building newer, better, straighter rail lines would require thegovernment to buy all the land between Point A and Point B and teardown anything that happened to be in the way. However, what's betweenPoint A and Point B is a great deal of highly valuable real estatethat will be very expensive to purchase.California displays all these problems totally. The part of the railline that was reasonably cheap to build didn't go anywhere near wherethe people were ； itran through the Central Valley where land was reasonably cheap andthe lobbies were relatively few.12.Inparagraph 1, the author intends to A.provethe point of the passageB.explaina government projectC.introducea topic for discussionD.presentthe background information13.Whatdo we know about the bullet train project?A.Allpeople are not in favor of the bullet train project.B.Thecost of the project is approximately 75 billion.C.Otherstates have to risk building their own bullet program.D.Theproject will make Americans travel rapidly, cozily andenvironmentally.14.Whatmainly leads to bullet train program's failure?A.Governorsin California tend to leave the project behind.B.Thedistance is the main reason to limit the bullet project in America.C.Noneof cities in America can afford to build a bullet train.D.Bullettrain is not as popular as express in America.15.Whatattitude does the author hold towards the high-speed rail inCalifornia?A.Indifferent. B. Neutral. C. Negative. D. Optimistic.方面的知识都比较想要了解，那么今天小好小编就为大家收集了一些关于DCalifornia likes to think of itself as the state where the futurehappens, and in 2008, its voters decided the future was high-speedrail. So they approved a $9 billion bond issue to begin an incrediblegovernment infrastructure project：a bullet train connecting San Francisco and Los-Angeles, at a cost of $33 billion.For years, the optimists have imagined Californians will travelquickly, comfortably and environmentally between the state*s twomajor population centers. The pessimists, meanwhile, have watched theproject costs a lot. At last count, the estimates had traveled up to$75 billion, even were still climbing.On Tuesday, Gov. Gavin News om (D) in his statespeech called for the state to transform the project to a less costlyrail that would run through the Central Valley, which attractedvoters' elsewhere attention,because what happened in Californiaillustrates the fact that any U.S. rail project may take a risk.Distance. In other places of the world, major population centers aremuch closer to each other. And big cities that are reasonably closetogether is pretty much an essential condition for high-speed rail,which is why they have it and we don't. Imagine what it would take tobuild a line from New York City to Los Angeles 一or to Chicago, Houston or Phoenix.Wealth. Of course, the United States does have a few cities that lookripe for rail. And instead of high-speed rail between these cities,we have the express, which takes eight hours to travel fromWashington to Boston. Why haven't we built something better? Becausetruly high-speed rail needs to travel in a fairly straight line.Building newer, better, straighter rail lines would require thegovernment to buy all the land between Point A and Point B and teardown anything that happened to be in the way. However, what's betweenPoint A and Point B is a great deal of highly valuable real estatethat will be very expensive to purchase.California displays all these problems totally. The part of the railline that was reasonably cheap to build didn't go anywhere near wherethe people were ； itran through the Central Valley where land was reasonably cheap andthe lobbies were relatively few.12.Inparagraph 1, the author intends to A.provethe point of the passageB.explaina government projectC.introducea topic for discussionD.presentthe background information13.Whatdo we know about the bullet train project?A.Allpeople are not in favor of the bullet train project.B.Thecost of the project is approximately 75 billion.C.Otherstates have to risk building their own bullet program.D.Theproject will make Americans travel rapidly, cozily andenvironmentally.14.Whatmainly leads to bullet train program's failure?A.Governorsin California tend to leave the project behind.B.Thedistance is the main reason to limit the bullet project in America.C.Noneof cities in America can afford to build a bullet train.D.Bullettrain is not as popular as express in America.15.Whatattitude does the author hold towards the high-speed rail inCalifornia?A.Indifferent. B. Neutral. C. Negative. D. Optimistic.","title_text":"DCalifornia likes to think of itself as the state where the futurehappens, and in 2008, its voters decided the future was high-speedrail. So they approved a $9 billion bond issue to begin an incrediblegovernment infrastructure project：a bullet train connecting San Francisco and Los-Angeles, at a cost of $33 billion.For years, the optimists have imagined Californians will travelquickly, comfortably and environmentally between the state*s twomajor population centers. The pessimists, meanwhile, have watched theproject costs a lot. At last count, the estimates had traveled up to$75 billion, even were still climbing.On Tuesday, Gov. Gavin News om (D) in his statespeech called for the state to transform the project to a less costlyrail that would run through the Central Valley, which attractedvoters' elsewhere attention,because what happened in Californiaillustrates the fact that any U.S. rail project may take a risk.Distance. In other places of the world, major population centers aremuch closer to each other. And big cities that are reasonably closetogether is pretty much an essential condition for high-speed rail,which is why they have it and we don't. Imagine what it would take tobuild a line from New York City to Los Angeles 一or to Chicago, Houston or Phoenix.Wealth. Of course, the United States does have a few cities that lookripe for rail. And instead of high-speed rail between these cities,we have the express, which takes eight hours to travel fromWashington to Boston. Why haven't we built something better? Becausetruly high-speed rail needs to travel in a fairly straight line.Building newer, better, straighter rail lines would require thegovernment to buy all the land between Point A and Point B and teardown anything that happened to be in the way. However, what's betweenPoint A and Point B is a great deal of highly valuable real estatethat will be very expensive to purchase.California displays all these problems totally. The part of the railline that was reasonably cheap to build didn't go anywhere near wherethe people were ； itran through the Central Valley where land was reasonably cheap andthe lobbies were relatively few.12.Inparagraph 1, the author intends to A.provethe point of the passageB.explaina government projectC.introducea topic for discussionD.presentthe background information13.Whatdo we know about the bullet train project?A.Allpeople are not in favor of the bullet train project.B.Thecost of the project is approximately 75 billion.C.Otherstates have to risk building their own bullet program.D.Theproject will make Americans travel rapidly, cozily andenvironmentally.14.Whatmainly leads to bullet train program's failure?A.Governorsin California tend to leave the project behind.B.Thedistance is the main reason to limit the bullet project in America.C.Noneof cities in America can afford to build a bullet train.D.Bullettrain is not as popular as express in America.15.Whatattitude does the author hold towards the high-speed rail inCalifornia?A.Indifferent. B. Neutral. C. Negative. D. Optimistic.方面的知识分享给大家，希望大家会喜欢哦。

1、12-15 DAAC